Workday in Court: A Turning Point for AI in Hiring?

What does this mean for recruitment?

𝗠𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝘆 𝘃. 𝗪𝗼𝗿𝗸𝗱𝗮𝘆: 𝗔 𝗪𝗮𝗸𝗲-𝗨𝗽 𝗖𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗛𝗥 𝗧𝗲𝗰𝗵?

A federal judge in California has granted preliminary certification for a nationwide collective action against Workday.

Job applicants over 40 who used Workday’s platform and were allegedly denied employment recommendations can now join the lawsuit. Plaintiffs claim Workday’s AI-powered screening tools (like Candidate Skills Match and Workday Assessment Connector) discriminated based on age, race, and disability.

The court found the claims sufficiently similar to proceed collectively, focusing on whether Workday’s AI had a disparate impact (when a seemingly fair hiring process ends up unfairly disadvantaging certain groups, even without intentional bias) on applicants over 40. Workday argued it doesn’t make final hiring decisions, but the court ruled its software is actively involved in recommending or rejecting candidates, making it potentially liable as an “agent” of employers under anti-discrimination laws.

What this means for HR tech vendors:

  • 𝗟𝗲𝗴𝗮𝗹 𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗸: Vendors are now directly exposed to liability for alleged AI discrimination.
  • 𝗢𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗸: Increased need for bias testing, transparency, and explainability.
  • 𝗘𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗼𝘆𝗲𝗿 𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗮𝗰𝘁: Employers may face more scrutiny and be pulled into litigation.
  • 𝗜𝗻𝗱𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗿𝘆 𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗳𝘁: This is a wake-up call for all TA leaders and vendors to audit systems and hiring practices for bias.

A New Era of Accountability

The 𝘔𝘰𝘣𝘭𝘦𝘺 𝘷. 𝘞𝘰𝘳𝘬𝘥𝘢𝘺 case signals a new era of accountability for HR tech vendors, and proactive governance, transparency, and compliance are now non-negotiable.

Our thanks and acknowledgements go to:
Excellent find, Gerry Crispin!  Preliminary Order: 𝘔𝘰𝘣𝘭𝘦𝘺 𝘷. 𝘞𝘰𝘳𝘬𝘥𝘢𝘺 in Comments,
and Anna Ott on Linkedin

So what should employers and HR teams do now?

If your organisation uses AI-driven tools in hiring — whether it's for screening, ranking, or recommending candidates — now is the time to take a closer look. This case highlights the importance of understanding exactly how your systems work, where potential bias might creep in, and what steps you're taking to prevent it. Transparency, fairness, and legal compliance aren’t just tech issues — they’re people issues. And the stakes are high: beyond potential legal exposure, there’s a risk to your brand, candidate trust, and your ability to attract diverse talent.

Using AI in your hiring process?

If you're unsure whether your hiring tech is helping or hurting, it's worth getting an expert perspective. Explore our HR Tech services to find out how we help organisations audit their recruitment systems and build ethical, effective hiring processes.

Author: Rachel Hill
July 5, 2025
Rachel Hill, Managing Director of Hill Consulting HRS and The Recruitment Skills Academy, brings 30+ years of global expertise in recruitment and talent strategy. She helps organisations attract top talent, improve processes, and upskill leaders. Passionate about candidate experience, diversity, and efficiency, Rachel’s mission is simple: “Recruit Better.”
The Recruitment Revolution

Sign up to our monthly Recruitment Revolution newsletter for tips on best practice and tricks to maximise recruitment efficiency

SIGN UP NOW
Follow Us  
Recent Posts